Tuesday, 8 October 2013

New Zealand qualify for the 2010 World Cup

So we did it!  Players, coaches and fans all played their part and will all receive the ultimate reward - the opportunity to attend the big show in South Africa as fully fledged participants.  But just as significantly, New Zealand Football can advance without the reflection of the Road to Spain in 1982 clogging up the rear view mirror.

Like the girl way out of your league that you improbably pulled when you were 15, wistful reflection on a remarkable series of matches in 1981 has undoubtedly been burnished by time and subsequent underachievement (our group of wilful amateurs consistently overachieved but it can't be ignored that their opponents such as Indonesia, Kuwait and China were far less advanced in sporting terms 27 years ago).

No football moment has been able to compete with the romance of the underdog nature of the campaign and never will, and an element of snobbery is evident in regular unflattering comparisons between that side and any subsequent.  The Road to Spain has come to dominate every element of every decision regarding football in New Zealand and symbolise the failure of the game in our country.  Until now.

Finally, a new brand of footballing success can be acknowledged and allowed to develop.

For too long a reverential view of that campaign, the conditions that produced the players involved and the players and coaching staff has been perpetuated.  Why is it that comment by players of the '82 vintage are always sought when someone like Vaughan Coveny, New Zealand's record goal scorer, involved in the game for the last 20 years and much more aware of the issues relevant today having experienced the frustrations of playing for and in New Zealand, is never heard from? 

Too regularly any positive steps taken in the intervening 27 years have been branded a failure simply for not living up to the memory of that achievement.  Many (but significantly not all) of our most famous football team have wanted out of the limelight for some time and will be relieved to see the mantel passed on.

Qualification also means that the system that produced not only the players involved on Saturday night, but also the improving junior Men's and Women's teams, may finally receive a more balanced appraisal. The home and away triumph over Bahrain is only most recent evidence of an improvement happening right across the spectrum.  That's not to say that many mistakes have been made, and the system needs a lot of work, but the framework that produced and prepared this group of players for the match on Saturday hasn't happened overnight and that should be acknowledged. [more after the jump]


*        *        *
  
Although it is difficult to quantify the impact that the international fixture programme pursued by the previous regime had on this side, there will also be a modicum of vindication for Graeme Seatter.  Although he nearly bankrupted New Zealand Football, and the disastrous South America tour hastened the retirement of a number of players in a way that John Bracewell would be proud of, he did expose us to international competition which demanded a lift in standards.  

No player has typified that elevation more than Tim Brown. Thrust into a position of leadership early he has taken every chance given to him and now sits as Ricki Herbert's most trusted on - field lieutenant for both club and country.

*        *        *

One thing that the '82 side didn't manage to achieve is a result at the tournament proper and this will be the immediate goal of Ricki's All Whites. 

The horrendous timing of the A-League season (the finals begin the weekend after the only remaining FIFA window) means that a full strength All Whites side is unlikely to play together before the end of the season.  Of greater concern is that the bulk of the squad will finish their competitive football in March at the latest. Motivation will not be lacking but it will be a difficult task to maintain fitness between the end of the A-League season and the pre-tournament camp.  This hands an advantage to players left out of the squad who will be involved in club football throughout the first half of 2010 (Kris Bright and Steven Old spring to mind).

The emotional intensity of the preparation for these matches and the ensuing celebrations will have advanced the spirit in the group - especially the involvement of the two newest members of the side - Fallon and McGlinchey - in the Wellington match.  But Football never stands still - you can only move forward or backwards - and tactically the All Whites, who are heavily reliant on experienced players in the starting XI, have plenty of work to do.

Some of our play at the Confederations Cup was almost wilfully naive - it is a football cliche that every match begins 11 on 11 but we have to acknowledge the disparity in ability.  We cannot be scared to play ugly as every nation values hard fought points at international level, although our muscular style which clearly unsettled the Bahrainis will need to be refined.  We are comfortable operating without the ball which will be our default setting in South Africa but we need to make more use of possession.

Loyalty to the players who qualified will probably see all 18 involved in Wellington travelling to South Africa but there must be questions about including two right backs when neither seems to have the confidence of the manager.  We need personnel available to allow us to play four at the back if required.

Some, including CEO Michael Glading, would prefer high profile match ups over winnable games in our World Cup campaign.  This is a sporting competition and on sporting terms we should be hoping for the weakest group possible.  This is the chance for the All Whites of 2010 to continue their story and outshine their predecessors.
                                       
*        *        *
 The tedious media driven debate over whether Football will supplant Rugby as New Zealand's national sport has once again risen its head.  Similar questions were asked of league after the tri-nations win in 2006 and is borderline mischief making designed to generate a backlash upon the sport which at that time has the limelight.  All but the most rabid supporter on either side of the argument see this as a pointless debate. Football will never overtake Union on the back of a single result when so few top class matches of significance are held in this country. 

But what the uninhibited response to the victory in Wellington has demonstrated is that the stranglehold that Rugby Union retains over the sporting media in NZ does not reflect the level of interest in a wide range of sports by your average fan. With a little prompting Football as a product will stand up when meaningful matches are scheduled against credible opponents - and crucially, the media acknowledge and report the fact. 

Perversely the All Whites' success could be a good thing for Rugby.  If Rugby fatigue is the cause of falling crowds and disenchantment then a spell out of the limelight in 2010 could refresh the sport in time for the World Cup in 2011.

*        *        *


Finally, could part of the $10million earned from the World Cup be spent in a better way than supporting a group of the best New Zealand youth players to play under the Phoenix banner in the Australian Youth League next season?  It's an absolute no - brainer.

No comments:

Post a Comment